Comments on: Give up RJS and go pure http://drnicwilliams.com/2006/11/17/give-up-rjs-and-go-pure/ Ruby makes Rails, Javascript makes Ajax, Dr Nic makes Magic Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:52:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Dr Nic http://drnicwilliams.com/2006/11/17/give-up-rjs-and-go-pure/comment-page-1/#comment-807 Dr Nic Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:31:42 +0000 http://drnicwilliams.com/2006/11/17/give-up-rjs-and-go-pure/#comment-807 @richard - pragmatically - if its already working now, I don't see significant benefits. Plus, for AjaxScaffold - a generator - there aren't enough unit tests (last time I looked) to let you refactor with confidence. @richard – pragmatically – if its already working now, I don’t see significant benefits. Plus, for AjaxScaffold – a generator – there aren’t enough unit tests (last time I looked) to let you refactor with confidence.

]]> By: Richard White http://drnicwilliams.com/2006/11/17/give-up-rjs-and-go-pure/comment-page-1/#comment-806 Richard White Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:23:53 +0000 http://drnicwilliams.com/2006/11/17/give-up-rjs-and-go-pure/#comment-806 I very much agree. Hmmm should AjaxScaffold move to use MinusR instead or would that just be a maintenance nightmare? I very much agree. Hmmm should AjaxScaffold move to use MinusR instead or would that just be a maintenance nightmare?

]]> By: RJS Minus R - The better way to render JavaScript from Rails http://drnicwilliams.com/2006/11/17/give-up-rjs-and-go-pure/comment-page-1/#comment-779 RJS Minus R - The better way to render JavaScript from Rails Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:52:21 +0000 http://drnicwilliams.com/2006/11/17/give-up-rjs-and-go-pure/#comment-779 [...] (Found via Dr. Nic Williams) [...] [...] (Found via Dr. Nic Williams) [...]

]]> By: zerohalo http://drnicwilliams.com/2006/11/17/give-up-rjs-and-go-pure/comment-page-1/#comment-722 zerohalo Sat, 18 Nov 2006 19:27:10 +0000 http://drnicwilliams.com/2006/11/17/give-up-rjs-and-go-pure/#comment-722 Sorry, never mind, found it on Dan's site. Sorry, never mind, found it on Dan’s site.

]]> By: zerohalo http://drnicwilliams.com/2006/11/17/give-up-rjs-and-go-pure/comment-page-1/#comment-721 zerohalo Sat, 18 Nov 2006 16:01:15 +0000 http://drnicwilliams.com/2006/11/17/give-up-rjs-and-go-pure/#comment-721 Is it possible to give an example? Is it possible to give an example?

]]> By: Dr Nic http://drnicwilliams.com/2006/11/17/give-up-rjs-and-go-pure/comment-page-1/#comment-720 Dr Nic Sat, 18 Nov 2006 13:39:16 +0000 http://drnicwilliams.com/2006/11/17/give-up-rjs-and-go-pure/#comment-720 Yeah, I just found RJS was a 3rd programming language of sorts. I knew Ruby, I knew Javascript, and now I needed to know RJS. If you've got to look up the Prototype/Scriptaculous libraries anyway to know what you can do and want classes/methods to call, may as well express it in JS. I might change my mind in time, but I think I'll use MinusR for awhile. Yeah, I just found RJS was a 3rd programming language of sorts. I knew Ruby, I knew Javascript, and now I needed to know RJS. If you’ve got to look up the Prototype/Scriptaculous libraries anyway to know what you can do and want classes/methods to call, may as well express it in JS.

I might change my mind in time, but I think I’ll use MinusR for awhile.

]]> By: Rodney http://drnicwilliams.com/2006/11/17/give-up-rjs-and-go-pure/comment-page-1/#comment-719 Rodney Sat, 18 Nov 2006 13:00:53 +0000 http://drnicwilliams.com/2006/11/17/give-up-rjs-and-go-pure/#comment-719 Most of the time rjs just confuses me. This has my vote. Much directer/clearer. Most of the time rjs just confuses me. This has my vote. Much directer/clearer.

]]> By: Chris http://drnicwilliams.com/2006/11/17/give-up-rjs-and-go-pure/comment-page-1/#comment-709 Chris Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:24:45 +0000 http://drnicwilliams.com/2006/11/17/give-up-rjs-and-go-pure/#comment-709 I'm in. I’m in.

]]>