Rails 2.0 TextMate bundle – Tasty Tidbit – respond_to and view navigation

Posted by Dr Nic on February 27, 2008 and blessed with 5 comments

The new release of the Rails TextMate bundle is coming soon. Its guaranteed to be shiny, sparkly and will fit in with any home or office decor. More importantly, it will be upgraded for Rails 2.0.

Today is the first Tasty Tidbit – a demonstration of one of the snazzy new features coming to your Macintosh soon.

In this Tasty Tidbit, we look at respond_to and the ability to create and navigate to view templates based on the selected format block, such as wants.js -> .js.rjs.

Cannot see the embedded video? Want the Hi-Def version? Download the video (5 Mb).

Contribute to the Bundle

To clone the git repository and start sharing your own personal goodness, see previous article.

Related posts:

  1. Closing in on The Dream: “one-click-to-deploy Rails apps” Got a simple app you want to build? Allocate...
  2. Need Rails Developers? Hire Australians There’s been some malarky very recently about “how do...
  3. TextMate easter egg: find bundle commands by key combo I’ve dreamed of the ability to ask TextMate “what frigging...
  4. Using Ruby within TextMate snippets and commands I didn’t know you could run Ruby within TextMate snippets....
  5. How to yell at people with GitHub from TextMate Sometimes when you are perusing code you ask the question:...
Trackbacks

Use this link to trackback from your own site.

Comments

Leave a response

  1. Daniel Fischer Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:26:58 UTC

    Bad ass. Thank you!

  2. http://mroderick.myopenid.com/ Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:06:45 UTC

    Looks very promising!

  3. http://openid.juice10.com/ Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:47:24 UTC

    Why do you taunt us with your previews? Arrg my hands a itching to use the finished version.
    (Good work btw!)

  4. http://tjgillies.myopenid.com/ Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:11:20 UTC

    test

  5. mlambie Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:41:41 UTC

    I’m very eager to check this out. Do you have an ETA for those of us that are impatient?

Comments